Footnotes:
(1) Thipakorawong states that the Chula Ratchamontri compound derives from the Arabic word "shura", meaning an Islamic council, and the Sanskrit word "montri", meaning a King’s counsellor, so that Chula Ratcha Montri means the King’s Muslim counsellor. He was the head of Muslims in Thailand as Sheikh'ul Islam. (Thipakorawong, 1979)
(2) The Krom Asa Cham (Cham Volunteer Corps) was a division of the Ministry of Defence, with the Phraya Ratchawangsan as the division chief (Chao Krom), responsible for the Cham volunteers, who were Muslims of Cham and Malay descent. (Chularatana, 2008)
(3) Chularatana states that Sen also became a Buddhist. Buddhism was used during the Ban Phlu Luang period, beginning with King Petracha (reign 1688-1703 CE), to foster a sense of identity and unity within the Siamese kingdom. Some of Sheikh Ahmad’s descendants in the Siamese bureaucracy probably worried about their instability (as non-core group members) and sought to escape by converting to Buddhism. After Phraya Phetphichai (Jai) became a Buddhist, he and his family succeeded in re-establishing their power and roles in the Siamese administration. Sen's son (with his second wife), Bunnag, became the progenitor of the Bunnag family and played a vital role in administering the Siamese kingdom from the early Rattanakosin period until the 1880s. (Aphornsuvan, 2003)
(4) In the royal pages, there were four directors (jang wang) directly under the department head, who was invariably a royal relative. These four held the title of Chao Muean, with a Sakdina of 1000, and were colloquially addressed as Phra Nai. The four were: Sanphet Phakdi, Si Sorarak, Samu Jairat, and Wai Woranat. (Ref: Baker, Chris & Phongpaichit, Pasuk (2012). The Tale of Khun Chang Khun Phaen: Siam’s Great Folk Epic of Love and War.)
(5) His son, Konkaew, was appointed by King Rama I to the position of Phraya Chula, the first Chula Ratchamontri in the Rattanakosin period. (Chularatana, 2008)
(6) The other three were the Department of General Administration, Appeals and Records, the Department of Royal Warehouses and the Department of Eastern Maritime Affairs and Crown Junks. (Ref: Hourdequin, Peter (2007). Muslim Influences in Seventeenth-Century Ayutthaya: A Review Essay.)
(7) In this case, the cemetery should date from the post-Ayutthaya period. The Burmese probably used Wat Thong as a war position and were thus abandoned by the Buddhist clergy. The monastery must have been seriously damaged either during the sieges of 1760 or 1766-1767 CE.
References:
[1] Chularatana, Julispong (2008). The Shi’ite Muslims in Thailand from Ayutthaya Period to the Present. Chulalongkorn University. Manusya: Journal of Humanities.
[2] www.bunnag.in.th retrieved on 19 February 2010.
[3] Chularatana, Julispong (2008). The Shi’ite Muslims in Thailand from Ayutthaya Period to the Present. Chulalongkorn University. Manusya: Journal of Humanities.
[4] Aphornsuvan, Thanet (2003). History and Politics of the Muslims in Thailand. Thammasat University.
[5] Thipakorawong, Chao Phraya (1979). Book of Multifarious Duties (หนังสือแสดง กิจจานุกิจ). Bangkok: Khurusapha.
[6] Chularatana, Julispong (2008). The Shi’ite Muslims in Thailand from Ayutthaya Period to the Present. Chulalongkorn University. Manusya: Journal of Humanities.
[7] Aphornsuvan, Thanet (2003). History and Politics of the Muslims in Thailand. Thammasat University.